Astronomie - Pluto probe offers eye-popping view of neighbouring star Proxima Centauri NASA’s New Horizons mission measures the distances of two stars from the outer reaches of the Solar System.



These composite images each show a star (Wolf 359 on the left; Proxima Centauri on the right) as seen from two points of view, one on Earth and the other on the New Horizons probe. The stars appear to move with respect to much more distant stars in the background.Credit: JHUAPL/MSFC/NASA

NASA’s New Horizons probe wowed the world in 2015 with unprecedented pictures of Pluto, and, more recently, with the first close-up images of an object in the Kuiper belt of asteroids. Now the mission has achieved yet another first: measuring the distances of two stars from the outer reaches of the Solar System.

“It's fair to say that New Horizons is looking at an alien sky, unlike what we see from Earth,” said Alan Stern, New Horizons principal investigator from Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, in a statement released 11 June.

Most space telescopes, from the venerable Hubble Space Telescope to the brand new European planet hunter CHEOPS, stay in the vicinity of Earth: being outside the atmosphere is enough to provide a great view, and there is usually no reason to venture farther. But there are sometimes advantages to making observations from deep space.

On 22 and 23 April, the New Horizons team pointed the probe’s main camera at Proxima Centauri — the star closest to the Sun — which is about 1.3 parsecs (4.2 light years) away, as well as another star, called Wolf 359. NASA asked professional and amateur astronomers to take pictures of these two stars, at exactly the same time, from Earth. Because New Horizons is now 46 times farther from the Sun than Earth is, the two points of view are distant enough that the stars’ positions look slightly different with respect to other, more distant objects. By measuring that difference, astronomers can calculate the two stars’ distances from Earth.

This is a time-honoured technique, called parallax, and it is at the heart of the most sophisticated 3D maps of the Milky Way Galaxy, including the current state-of-the-art map, made by the European Space Agency’s Gaia probe. Parallax works on the same principle as binocular vision, which enables humans to roughly estimate the distance to an object by pointing both eyes on it.

But Gaia is stationed relatively close to Earth, and it calculates parallax by comparing its views of the same stars six months apart, either side of half an orbit around the Sun. Those two positions differ by merely twice the Sun–Earth distance — not 46 times, as in the case of the New Horizons probe. As a consequence, the parallax angles are tiny, and Gaia produces tables of numbers rather than something for people to look at.

“For all the impressive work Gaia does, you can’t see it,” says New Horizons team member Tod Lauer, an astronomer at the US National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory in Tucson, Arizona. “Here, you can see it — KaBlam!” The two shots of Proxima Centauri, one from the Kuiper belt and the other from Earth, show the star clearly shifting position. The images could become as iconic and memorable as the celebrated Pale Blue Dot, a picture of Earth taken by NASA’s Voyager 1 probe in 1990, Lauer says. The team has already been contacted by authors of astronomical textbooks who want to include the images in their next editions.

Watching from afar

Putting observatories into deep space — that is, anywhere beyond the Earth–Moon system — could offer a number of advantages. The best location for tracking potentially dangerous asteroids would be the inner Solar System, where objects that travel close to Earth — called NEOs, or near-Earth objects — would be seen against the darkness of space instead of the brightness of the Sun.

“With an orbit internal to the Earth’s, it is possible to have all NEOs outside the orbit,” says Paolo Tanga at the Côte d’Azur Observatory in Nice, France. “That way, all NEOs sooner or later end up in opposition to the Sun with respect to the observatory, which are the most favourable conditions for observations.” (BepiColombo, a double-probe mission currently on a seven-year journey to Mercury, was originally supposed to include a dedicated NEO telescope, but the plan was shelved to cut costs.)

Meanwhile, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a trio of space probes that the European Space Agency plans to launch in 2034, will detect gravitational waves from a vantage point far from the disturbances of the Earth–Moon system. And, on occasion, it helps to do astronomy from the surface of Mars (see ‘Stargazing from Mars’).


There’s not much astronomy you can do from Mars that you cannot do better from Earth, but there are some important exceptions. This July, NASA’s Curiosity rover will make a unique observation of the star Betelgeuse. The star — which forms the Orion constellation’s right shoulder — had a period of unusual dimness during the past year, temporarily losing more than two-thirds of its brightness.

In around April every year, Betelgeuse starts to get too close to the Sun, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, to make precise measurements from Earth until July, says Edward Guinan, an astrophysicist at Villanova University near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who has been tracking the star for 25 years. To fill in the gap in brightness measurements, Guinan asked the Curiosity team to photograph Betelgeuse from the Martian surface. If Martian weather cooperates — the red planet is notorious for its dust storms — in July Curiosity will be able to see whether Betelgeuse is continuing to behave oddly. “Among ourselves, we’re making bets on how bright it will be,” says Guinan. Astronomers hope that the observations could provide insight into the evolution of a star that is doomed to go supernova — even though that might not happen for another 100,000 years.

NASA has done astronomy from Mars before. In 2005, the Spirit and Opportunity rovers made the most precise observations ever of the trajectories of Mars’s tiny moons, Phobos and Deimos. Their slowly evolving orbits indirectly reveal the density of Mars’s interior, says Mark Lemmon, a planetary scientist at Texas A&M University in College Station who led that study. “You can determine, basically, how squishy Mars is,” he says.

More recently, the Curiosity rover observed the comet Siding Spring, as it flew near Mars in 2014. Mars rovers also routinely make observations of the Sun itself, including sunspots.

Occasionally, the international flotilla of satellites orbiting Mars makes astronomical observations, too. NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) took a spectacular image of Earth and the Moon together in 2007. The MRO and two other orbiters — Mars Express and the 2001 Mars Odyssey — also watched Siding Spring’s 2014 passage. And just this week, NASA released new images of Phobos taken by Odyssey.


In the case of stellar-distance measurements, an observatory with Gaia’s sophistication could get much more precise parallaxes if it orbited far away. For example, at five times father from the Sun than Earth is — Jupiter’s distance — measurements would become five times more precise, at least in principle.

But astronomers have rarely considered sending probes into deep space. One reason is the time it would take for these instruments to gather good measurements. Gaia needs to orbit the Sun multiple times and to measure stars repeatedly to get a good parallax, and anything orbiting at Jovian distances would take much longer to do that, says Michael Perryman, an astronomer at University College Dublin who was among Gaia’s founding members. “Neglecting the energetic problems of getting a satellite there, and slowing it down, this would require a measurement duration of 3 to 5 orbits, or between 36 and 60 years,” says Perryman. “Enough said!”

Because New Horizons is combining its shots with images taken from Earth, it can get a parallax in one go, without having to wait. The probe was never designed to do astronomy, so its measurement of Proxima Centauri’s distance is orders of magnitude less precise than Gaia’s, Lauer says. But he adds that getting a better measurement was never the goal. The point was to demonstrate how far human ingenuity has come.

Quelle: nature

Raumfahrt+Astronomie-Blog von CENAP [-cartcount]